What exactly did Novak Djokovic propose?

Djokovic proposed that sets be played to four won games instead of six, with the abolition of the advantage rule after 40-40, and that matches be played to three won sets, with the goal of lasting no longer than two hours.

Why is Djokovic's proposal controversial?

It is controversial because it would radically change the format of tennis that has been played for decades, and it is especially surprising coming from Djokovic, a player known for his endurance and victories in marathon matches.

Who supported Djokovic?

German tennis player Alexander Zverev came to his defense, pointing out that Djokovic's proposals are not driven by personal interest given his immense wealth.

Where is Novak Djokovic currently?

Djokovic is skipping the ATP Masters 1000 tournament in Montreal and enjoying a break on Montenegro's Adriatic coast.

Football

Djokovic Shocks the Tennis World: Sets to Four Games

A.P. · Prije 4h | 3 min

The Serbian tennis player shared a vision of a radical format change with an influencer, claiming it would make tennis more dynamic and better suited to today's audience.

Summary

Novak Djokovic proposed a radical change to tennis rules: sets to four games and the abolition of advantage after 40-40.
The proposal aims to shorten matches to a maximum of two hours and make tennis more dynamic.
Alexander Zverev defended Djokovic, emphasizing that his proposals are not motivated by personal interest.
Djokovic is currently resting on Montenegro's coast and skipping the tournament in Montreal.

Novak Djokovic, one of the greatest tennis players of all time, has revealed his most controversial opinion about the "white sport" that he is ready to defend without reservation. In a conversation with influencer Nick Coutracos, the 39-year-old Serb proposed a completely new scoring system that would fundamentally change the way tennis is played and watched.

Rule Revolution: Shorter Sets, No Advantage

Djokovic's idea rests on two key pillars. The first is shortening sets from the current six to four won games. The second is abolishing the advantage rule after a deuce at 40-40, which would decide each game on the very next point. According to his proposal, matches would be played to three won sets, and the entire match would not last longer than two hours.

"I think tennis needs a new scoring system. It shouldn't be played to six won games. I believe a set should last until four won games, with the potential elimination of advantage at 40-40. You'd play until someone wins three such shortened sets. That way, matches wouldn't last more than two hours, which in my opinion is best for everyone," Djokovic stated.

The proposal is particularly intriguing given that Djokovic is known as one of the most physically and mentally enduring players in history, having built his career on victories in multi-hour, grueling matches. Despite this, he believes that shortening the format would benefit the entire sport, making it more dynamic and suited to an audience that craves a faster pace.

Zverev Comes to Djokovic's Defense

While Djokovic enjoys a break on Montenegro's Adriatic coast and skips this year's ATP Masters 1000 tournament in Montreal, one of his rivals from the top of the world rankings has spoken about his status and motives. Alexander Zverev, this year's Roland Garros champion and currently the world No. 3, has come to the defense of the Serbian ace.

"He has over 400 million in the bank; do you think this matters to him?" Zverev said, alluding to the fact that Djokovic's proposals are not driven by personal interest but by a genuine desire to improve tennis.

Djokovic's statements, regardless of the context in which they are made, traditionally draw attention and leave a mark on the tennis world. Whether his vision will ever come to fruition remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the debate on the evolution of tennis rules has just gained its loudest and most influential advocate.