In a scene reminiscent of a Ray Bradbury dystopian novel, American AI company Anthropic conducted a secret project codenamed Panama, during which machines in warehouses across the United States sliced book spines like salami, scanned their contents, and then sent the destroyed paper to recycling. According to a Euronews report citing unsealed court documents, the goal was to "destructively scan all the books in the world" to train the AI model Claude.
An internal Anthropic document, made public in late July 2026, explicitly states: "We don't want anyone to know we're working on this." The project was launched in early 2024, with executives seeking books older than those available online, believing they would teach Claude "how to write well," rather than mimic "low-quality internet speech."
How the Book Destruction Factory Worked
Anthropic purchased thousands of books at once from multiple suppliers, including Better World Books and the UK-based World of Books. According to N1 Hrvatska, the company acquired hundreds of thousands of books. Euronews, meanwhile, reports that an external supplier, which eventually worked with Anthropic, was tasked with "finding an experienced document scanning service provider to convert 500,000 to 2 million books over a six-month period."
After purchase, the books were handed to a subcontractor who used a hydraulic machine to cut off spines and slice pages one by one. The pages were then scanned with high-speed industrial devices, and the digital content was uploaded to the AI training system in milliseconds. The destroyed paper ended up in recycling plants where it was turned into products like toilet paper and cardboard boxes.
Pirate Libraries and the LibGen Shadow Library
Court filings reveal that destroying physical books was not the only way Anthropic obtained copyrighted content. Co-founder Ben Mann had already downloaded a collection of copyrighted material from the shadow library LibGen in June 2021, and the filing includes a screenshot of Mann's browser during the download of pirated books.
In 2021, Mann shared a link to the Pirate Library Mirror, a complete catalog of illegally obtained books, with other Anthropic employees, commenting: "Just in time!!!"
Authors' Lawsuit and Historic Settlement
Project Panama only came to light through thousands of pages of court documents unsealed in July 2026. Back in 2024, a group of authors, led by writer Andrea Bartz and publicists Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson, filed a class-action lawsuit against Anthropic, claiming the company violated copyright laws by using pirated books to train its AI model.
Last month, Anthropic, valued at an estimated $965 billion (about €875 billion), agreed to pay $1.5 billion (about €1.3 billion) to settle, covering approximately 500,000 eligible works. "This is the largest known author settlement in history," said Justin Nelson, the authors' attorney.
A June 2025 ruling found that using legally purchased books was protected under the fair use doctrine in U.S. law, but drew a distinction between purchased books and the millions of previously pirated ones. "The June 2025 ruling remains intact. The issue we resolved was about how some materials were obtained, not whether we can use them for development [of AI]," Aparna Sridhar, deputy general counsel at Anthropic, told the Washington Post.
AI Industry Under Scrutiny
The Anthropic case is the first in a series of lawsuits against AI companies to end in a settlement. Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft also face similar copyright infringement lawsuits from authors. Several authors who declined to participate in the class settlement are still pursuing individual cases against Anthropic.
The documents also revealed the mindset at the top of the AI industry, suggesting that Anthropic executives may have believed they would get away with it, and even if they didn't, that the end justified the means. For many observers, the unsealed documents represent a more lasting judgment, shattering the illusion that the world's largest tech companies understand cultural value or respect the sanctity of human creativity.