HR EN DE
NEWS SPORT BIZNIS SCENA LIFESTYLE TECH

Split: State Attorney's Office Appeals Judge's Decision Not to Order Detention

The County State Attorney's Office in Split has launched an investigation against a Croatian citizen on suspicion of rape, grievous bodily harm, and threats. The investigating judge rejected the motion for pretrial detention and imposed precautionary measures, prompting the prosecution to file an appeal.

Foto: cottonbro studio na Pexels
Summary
  • The State Attorney's Office in Split has launched an investigation against a Croatian citizen on suspicion of raping a minor and other serious criminal offenses.
  • The incidents occurred on July 31 and August 5, 2026, in the Split-Dalmatia County area.
  • The investigating judge rejected the motion for pretrial detention and imposed precautionary measures, a ban on approaching and contacting the victim and witnesses.
  • The prosecution has appealed this decision, maintaining that grounds for pretrial detention still exist.

In Split, the County State Attorney's Office has issued an order to launch an investigation against a Croatian citizen, as there is reasonable suspicion that he committed several serious criminal offenses against a minor. The investigation covers suspicions of rape, attempted grievous bodily harm, violent behavior, and threats, and pertains to events that occurred on July 31 and August 5, 2026, in the Split-Dalmatia County area.

Two separate incidents under the prosecution's scrutiny

According to the prosecution's statement, there is a well-founded suspicion that on July 31, the suspect had sexual intercourse with the victim without her consent. The victim was born in 2008, and neither her identity nor that of the suspect has been made public for protection purposes.

The second incident occurred on August 5, when the suspect, allegedly acting on a prior agreement with a currently unidentified male, inflicted bodily injuries on the victim and made threats against her. Details about the injuries, the exact location of the incident, and the circumstances of the attack have not been disclosed.

Judge rejects pretrial detention, imposes precautionary measures

After the suspect's initial questioning, the prosecution proposed pretrial detention to the investigating judge of the County Court in Split, citing the risk of reoffending and the possibility of influencing witnesses as grounds.

The investigating judge did not accept the proposal. Instead of pretrial detention, he issued a ruling imposing precautionary measures on the suspect, a ban on approaching the victim and a ban on establishing or maintaining contact with the victim and witnesses. According to available information, it is unclear at what distance the suspect must remain from the victim, nor how compliance with these measures will be monitored.

Prosecution files an appeal

The County State Attorney's Office in Split disagreed with this decision. It has filed an appeal against the investigating judge's ruling, maintaining that grounds for pretrial detention still exist. The competent court will decide on the appeal, and until then, the precautionary measures will remain in effect.

The State Attorney's Office has not yet announced a possible timeline for the court to resolve the appeal. During the investigation, the prosecution may examine witnesses, collect documents, request expert analyses, and conduct other evidentiary actions to decide whether to file an indictment.

Presumption of innocence

The order to conduct an investigation does not mean the suspect has been found guilty. His guilt can only be established through a final court verdict after the proceedings have concluded. The aim of the investigation is to clarify the full sequence of events, the role of the suspect, a Croatian citizen, and to identify the other male mentioned in the prosecution's statement.

FAQ
What criminal offenses is the suspect suspected of? +
The suspect is suspected of rape, attempted grievous bodily harm, violent behavior, and threats.
Why is the prosecution appealing the judge's decision? +
The prosecution believes that grounds for pretrial detention exist, the risk of reoffending and the possibility of influencing witnesses, and disagrees with the imposition of less severe precautionary measures.
What precautionary measures have been imposed on the suspect? +
The suspect is prohibited from approaching the victim and from establishing or maintaining contact with the victim and witnesses.
Has the suspect been found guilty? +
No. The order to conduct an investigation does not imply guilt, criminal liability is established solely through a final court verdict.

Log in

You need to log in or register to comment.

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!
Search
Popular
Nedavno pretraživano
helsinški sporazum
liga prvaka
digitalni mediji
Login
Home
Make 5MIN.hr a preferred source
Follow us on social media
Categories